What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

  1. I agree with 2:39. The Department of Buildings turned down the design for one specific building. A 185-foot tall structure is permissible at this location and may get built, after a re-design.

    While 5:33 can rightly criticize the editorial stance of the Courier-Life papers (and is 1000% correct about the opinion writers), I feel like the chain trys to get the story straight. The Brooklyn Papers sexs up stories to make the weekly a tantalizing read, and the truth gets lost somewhere.

  2. Any article that takes FIERCE and FUREE seriously as “innovative advocacy groups” isn’t worth the paper it’s printed on.

    Not to mention that the comparison of the Fulton Mall to Chinatown is ridiculous and asinine. In Chinatown, the Chinese own the buildings, own the stores, and LIVE in the area.

    The Fulton Mall? Whites own the buildings, Asian and Middle Eastern immigrants operate the stores, and NO ONE lives there.

    I can’t wait until the Fulton Mall and Downtown Brooklyn changes and gentrifies to serve the entire community that lives in the area (Brooklyn Heights, Boerum Hill, Fort Greene, etc) and NOT just the small segment of the population that lives in the nearby public housing projects.

  3. The Brooklyn Paper is horrible. The news article is reporting on a routine DOB action.

    The City didn’t “block” anything. Building permits for new buildings or alterations are routinely rejected for various bureaucratic reasons (usually insufficient paperwork). It has nothing to do with the overall merits or legality of a given project.

  4. I agree that Downtown Brooklyn is seedy, ugly, and depressing. Urbanistically, it would make a perfect blank canvas. A new downtown, well-designed and attractive is what we need. Downtown is stuck in 1974.